Controversy Over Palin's Pay

The California State University Stanislaus Foundation will not disclose how much it is paying Sarah Palin to speak at the campus - which is raising questions about the foundation and others like it, and how they spend their money.

Palin, who usually charges between $100,000 to $200,000 in speaker fees according to the California Faculty Association's newsletter, is set to speak at CSU Stanislaus for the celebration of the campus' 50th anniversary in June. The $500-a-plate, black-tie event is a fundraiser for the school which hopes to net $100,000 to $200,000 after cost, said Matt Swanson, the president of the foundation, in a San Francisco Chronicle story. The terms of Palin's contract with the foundation doesn't allow for the disclosure of how much she is being paid for the event, which is making some organizations and lawmakers scrutinize the secrecy that these auxiliary foundations work under.

"This is just the latest example in a continuing pattern of problems involving these foundations that highlights the need for better oversight," said CFA president Lillian Taiz in the organizations newsletter. "At a time when the 23 CSU campuses are severely underfunded, it is imperative that every penny be used to serve students in the classroom."

The CFA is calling for the foundation to make public how much it is paying Palin for her appearance as well as how much the event is costing the foundation to put on, but these figures remain hidden. The Palin controversy has also sparked the interest of San Francisco lawmaker Leland Yee who is pushing for his bill SB330 The bill would apply California's public records law to auxiliary organizations tied to the public higher education systems, including the UC, CSU, and community college campuses. This bill would make the financial records of these auxiliary organizations, which are private businesses that are connected to a campus such as the 49er book store, transparent to the public and would allow for more financial accountability.

Photo courtesy of San Francisco Chronicle

Marchers Rally at State Capitol

An estimated 7,500 people gathered in front of the state Capitol to help fight for California's future on April 21st, reported the California Federation of Teachers website.

The rally was the culmination of the 48-day-long March for California's Future, which started March 5th and stretched from Bakersfield to Sacramento. The demonstration was led by six core marchers including San Diego City College professor Jim Miller, Los Angeles probation officer Irene Gonzalez, retired southern California teacher Gavin Riley, Watsonville community organizer Manny Ballesterors, Pajaro Valley teacher Jenn Laskin, and Los Angeles substitute teacher Davie Lyell.


Supporters at the rally were not strictly teachers and students, but were varied members of the community including domestic workers, nurses, office staff, children, pastors, and union representatives. Some participated in the 300 mile march, others arrived in one of the 80 buses that drove from cities across the state - ranging from San Diego to Eureka.

In his blog, Miller explained that the rally was more than just a fight for California's education, but an united effort for a common goal shared by all members of the community. "It becomes clear that this march is not just a march about stopping cuts, it is a march for access to opportunity and equality. Our struggle is a civil rights struggle and our movement is a movement for social justice for all Californians, not just those affluent enough to get in the door."

The organizations supporting the rally were just as varied as the participants as AFSCME, CSEA, the Firefighters, CFA, SEIU, and the UFCW all united to fight for California's future.

The March for California's Future had two goals, reported the CFT website. The first was to spread the word that the state budget crisis is the result of decisions made by the Legislature and Governor, and that we must hold the state accountable by demanding for the restoration of public education. The second was to establish a political coalition that would have a lasting impact on how the state runs itself.
As marchers headed north, they collected signatures to help put the Majority Vote Budget Act on the November 2010 ballot. This bill would overturn the two-thirds requirement for state legislature to pass a budget, replacing it with simple majority vote.

Though not one legislator addressed the rally as was requested, the marchers were not short of testimonies as they listened to laid-off school teachers, farm workers who had marched with Cesar Chavez, and the leaders of the March for California's Future.


Photos courtesy of newsreview.com, cft.org, and Jim Miller's Blog respectively. Video courtesy of youtube.com

The Waiting Is The Hardest Part

Approximately 8,000 students state wide know this feeling of limbo all to well as they anxiously wait to find out their admission status into CSU campuses for this fall.

The Daily 49er reported that this is due to the extreme budget cuts that the CSU and UC systems have endured over the past year. Both systems continue to scramble to find lifeboats, lifejackets, driftwood - anything to cling to as they go down with this sinking ship that is the California budget. One method being implemented is the wait-listing of thousands of students state wide for the fall semester of 2010.

CSULB already has more than 3,000 students expecting to transfer this fall, reports the Daily 49er, but most will have to wait until the summer before finding out whether they will be spending their fall at The Beach. Their fate teeters on Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's already shaky academic budget proposal for the 2010-11 school year. Campuses plan to only admit as many students as state funds will allow, but the amount the universities will receive from the budget still remains unclear.

Schwarzenegger's budget plans to restore $305 million to the CSU system with an additional $60.6 million possibly coming from federal aid to help campuses increase enrollment. Yet, the proposal is likely to face adversity in the state Legislature during an election year.

The Daily 49er reports that both the CSUs and UCs plan to notify wait-listed students starting the first of June, until then the waiting game continues.